Case Studies
#1 Avoiding Mishaps
#2 Discrepancies
#3 Circumvent Scrap
#4 Requirements
#5 Identifying

Case Five - Leading Semiconductor Company

A major, well-known semiconductor company realizes the importance of Layer Compare

Outel has two lots of boards, one by Fabricator X and the other by Fabricator Y. After QA examines the boards, they find inconsistent signal performance between the two lots of boards.

Outel requests tooled data from both fabricators to compare artwork...

  • Plane clearances on PCBs from Fab X are increased by .006
  • Trace impedance are no longer within spec due to increased ground clearances

Outel REFUSES to pay Fabricator X.

Identifying Differences Ensures Accuracy

Graphically comparing artwork layers will ensure PCB performance. Layer Compare is necessary to accurately identify differences. It compares layers intelligently with automatic "go-to" delta enabling:

  • Fast detection of ECO revisions between artworks
  • Detection of artwork modification by fabricators

Layer Compare supports filters to find differences based on size.

The Result

Outel lost a lot of time and money due to this oversight. Fab Y receives an order to produce more boards for Outel. 50% of Outel's shipping capacity is delayed while waiting for additional PCBs.

Outel has yet to place another PCB order with Fab X.

In Conclusion

Outel has revised their process to delay approval of all PCBs until a full CAM350 Layer Compare analysis is performed against tooled artwork.